Forum: Community Center


Subject: Violence and interpretation in images

Naylin opened this issue on May 24, 2005 ยท 59 posts


Argon18 posted Sat, 28 May 2005 at 2:17 PM

just express it another way and repost. It's not worth having people going on to the site and seeing things that offend them. But you can find something that offends just about anyone, for example people from PETA could be offend by images of Vicki wearing furs. are we going to find other ways of expressing that? What else would it be? How much would be left if we starting thinking that way? Shouldn't others take more responsibility for what offends them? Instead of trying to force others to eliminate it, and make the whole site conform to their vision, why not allow other people the freedom to look at what they want as they look at what suits their tastes?


Click to get a printed and bound copy plus T-shirts, mugs and hats