Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: F 202 female?

Butch opened this issue on May 28, 2005 ยท 13 posts


Nalif posted Sun, 29 May 2005 at 12:39 AM

Supposedly Daz didn't have a problem with the figure sharing the same UV cords. They had a problem with figure basically being a V3 without the need for owning V3. It had the same UV cords, had the same joint paramaters, and the same shape. From my understanding, in the end, Daz had said that Lilin 2 could be redistributed as long as they encoded the figure, which would have to be decoded using V3. That way people would have to own V3 to use Lilin 2, which seemed reasonable as V3 is now free. There were other misunderstandings that didn't sit well with Sixus, though, so they scraped the project. That's what I gather from the origional posts. It was later discovered that the Daz EULA isn't too friendly when it comes to making material for their unimesh figures. I forget the specifics. So now everyone goes crazy when they see something that works for V3 in any way what so ever :) To make a long answer short: I seriously doubt Daz is going to care.