@ shinyary, I know that anarchy doesn't work, I point out that in my post, because of human nature it will fail, all I was saying that if you go beyond the dictionary definition, that theoretical anarchy is supposed to be a good thing - at least that's what we were taught in political and philosophical studies at college, we then went on to explain why, the theoretical state is unachievable and hence people forget the true essence of the ideaology. We actually did the same thing with democracism, socialism, and the other theoretical governmental types, none of which are actually attainable. For example what we have in most countries that regard themselves as a democracy is not in truth in a democracy, which in its purest form would require all citizens of a country to vote on every governmental decision - again an impossible state to realise. This is one of those areas which also covers how language evolves. The understanding of the word democracy or anarchy becomes the common idea rather then the pure form. A great example are the words awesome and awful which about 150 years ago meant the same thing, but over time awful has moved to become the opposite, just as it's spelling has moved from the original awefull.

----------

Toolset: Blender, GIMP, Indigo Render, LuxRender, TopMod, Knotplot, Ivy Gen, Plant Studio.