I didn't say leave the community in the dark at all (and previous threads on the similarities were already posted) - but there was information that sixus had due to their access to private forums about this being looked into. The issue wasn't being ignored or let be as the orignal post implies - that is what I have a problem with, the implication that nothing was being done and no one was looking into it when they knew better. It was intentionally misleading in that way.

There were ulterior motives for this - they basically stated so in their first post. Their comment in regards to "not knowing we were breaking the EULA" Whatever...., this figure was contracted out that means that in this case (and most know I'm no big 'rosity fan - heck I wasn't even planning on supporting Renda) 'rosity was equally if not more unaware - if there is indeed a violation of the DAZ EULA.

There were previous posts about Renda and V3 already on this board. So if there were concerns those overlay pictures would have been enough for most to begin looking into it. I am also not saying that modle should have been released in the condition that she was - nope no way!

Message edited on: 06/29/2005 08:28

3-D Arena | Instagram | Facebook

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.
-Galileo