sixus1 opened this issue on Jun 28, 2005 ยท 430 posts
AlleyKatArt posted Wed, 29 June 2005 at 9:35 AM
You can have the Narcissus and the bluebells, I'll take a few Hyacinth. (They're so pretty when they're in bloom!) Natolli, as for the testing standards... Renderosity has decent standards, so far as I'm concerned, for OTHER people's products. As long as it doesn't crash the program and has all the nessisary files, does what it says, it'll pass. They don't judge the quality, they just make sure it works like it should. (Of course, occasionally we get a newbie tester who flunks an item because THEY don't know what to do...) For their OWN stuff, they seem to force it out as quick as they can, like a group of pit mechanics shouting 'movemovemove' at each other. I would personally be ashamed to have my name attatched to the base Renda figure. I could list, at length, the issues with the figure but there's no real point, as they've been hashed and rehashed by many people, including one or two of the merchants who were notified in advance of her release. I do know, however, that I will be a little more careful of 'Flagship' characters. This is the second flagship character to have some sort of scandal surrounding it. While it's not the tester's fault that Renda fits V3 stuff so well, it IS their fault that she was approved with those nasty joint problems and the mesh issues she has. (Have you ever seen a woman's breasts with deep notches in them?) Blackhearted, I'm sorry your time and effort on that beautiful morph were for naught. I truly do admire your Renda girl, because you took dog turds and turned them into a super model. Unfortunately, when you choose to support ANY figure, you're taking a risk, either that the product won't sell or that the product will be removed when there are copyright problems. :(
Kreations By Khrys