Hahaha - yet again - nice repartee... but little real substance to explain your previous posting... I am not attacking anyone's character - I am questioning the attitude and reasoning behind the comments made about the topic at hand here. I took your posting an image of a pile of excrement as an example of behaviour unbecoming - no matter what you may have meant, and Tim's gallery as an example of what does or doesn't work for me as far as "art" is concerned. If you still cannot back up your previous posting with a fact or two, then how do you expect me (or others) to know exactly what you meant by posting it? The current post is ambiguous at best - if you meant the structure of the Hot 20, then why did you not state that in the post? I and others can read it as being your opinion of the work, not the structure... and that is what I find appalling behaviour. If you think that by my stating my opinion is a character assassination - then you might want to go back and read this whole thread in it's entirety, and take everything in the context that it appears. Then maybe come back and back up your argument with a few facts and reasoning...? T.

Who? Me?