Attached Link: You call this Veracity?

How is it helpful or an "unbiased examination" for someone to comment ***"wow - or should i say WHOA!! - boy, that's one for ASAIRS!!!!! you're towing the line of good taste - and the decent and proper treatment of ALL animals here by posing them as objects of this boy's flaming blue pantsed desires! watch out young man and juyst remember, ART DOESN'T HAVE TO REPLICATE LIFE!!!!"*** On an image that only has a horses head in the foreground with a figure in the background? The comment isn't even in any way relevant. Projecting those kind of delusions, desires and ***LIFE EXPERIENCES!!!!!!!*** might be fun for the viewer, but how is the artist responsible for it? It sure fits the definition of a ***dog-goned troll*** in my book If you want to critique an image, have it at least apply to it, not something out of left field that jas nothing to do with it.

Click to get a printed and bound copy plus T-shirts, mugs and hats