Tashar59 opened this issue on Sep 01, 2005 ยท 61 posts
12rounds posted Thu, 01 September 2005 at 3:27 PM
Beryld: yeah I missed it. I got it now. And agree with you totally. Compressing images to reasonable sizes is the polite thing to do IMO. Even on broadband, those large images take quite some time to open.
I understand the realism aspect as well... a better compression method such as jpeg2000 is already in existence (and also supported by major houses like Adobe and Corel), but hardly used since browser manufacturers are reluctant in adopting it quickly. Shame really.
Message edited on: 09/01/2005 15:41