Monday, September 5, 2005 6:50 PM Pacific Time Dear Sheila. These two images are a dramatic improvement over the previous ones posted. I personally like the second one more, only because of the balance between IF treatment and that which is not effected by the filter. This does not mean the upper one is no good. Just my own taste so to speak. While on the subject of the first one, I would recommend toning the highlights of the IF down just a bit so we see more detail. It may be in the original and this is do to the down-sizing and jpg quality. You must look at the original on that. You will also find that certain times of the day have different affects on the IF filter and therefore the results will change. So it is important that you note not only the exposure but also the time of day and the relationship of the sun. Was it behind you, from the side or facing you. In general, Sheila, you are on the right track. I would also note that you should remember that I am taking about IF film experience and not digital since I have not tried to do this with the digital camera yet, however I believe there should be no differences between the two. Again congratulations on your success. Egmont