DIMENSION_X opened this issue on Sep 19, 2005 ยท 148 posts
wolf359 posted Mon, 19 September 2005 at 10:13 AM
"Does it really make sense that Daz would spend three years and fully ignore two new versions of Poser if there WEREN'T planning on it being an eventual replacement."<<<< So Daz intends Studio to be a replacement for poser? Pardon me, but why should poser users fear such plans?? "10 plugins later "or not it wont stop anyone,EF or third party, from developing new poser content. (shader spider, real skin shader, wardrobe wizard, puppet master, Mikki Apollo maximus ,project human etc.) what vital Poser technology does DAZ truly own and can take away from us?? Vicky's JPs?...... Pffffttt!! that INJECT/REM/CHAN/VIS/DELTA BULLSH*T requiring the presence of nearly 800 support files per unimess clone??....please ;-/ Not seeing the ominous, evil conspiracy here consider looking outside the jaded world of poser for a moment There was Deep paint 3D first then MAXON created Bodypaint 3D with the rather obvious goal of going after Deep paint 's market Now luxology's incredible MODO 201 is looking to replace Maxons Bodypaint in many artist toolset. life in the big city :-) as far as DAZ's EULA is concerned I imagine mature adult,s with wise legal council, will decide for themselves if its terms are acceptable the same way they do when they agree to the terms of a mortgage contract etc. and if it is as Draconian and restrictive as some are apparently alleging then that will be a problem for DAZ not poser USERS.