OK, so it doesn't suck :) but it is what it is - not exactly the most popular image that I have created. I'm just trying to figure out how putting it in a separate "IFS" gallery would make it better or more popular, or be more satisfying. Which brings up another point. Apo flames are Iterated Function Systems fractals. UF can do those and so can several other programs (I swear I have even seen XD do them). What would be the most sensible way to categorize these new galleries? Lot's of people stack flames together in Photoshop. Would these go in the apo gallery? Or maybe the programs-that-layer-fractals gallery. Or maybe the IFS gallery, which makes the most sense to me, because then we would be comparing apples with apples, but what a mess this is all becoming! I can't resist 2 more categories: How about the "pure" and "dirty" fractal galleries? I'll stick with the dirt. It has more texture :-)