It really frosts my cake, watching all you infantophiles use texturing to excuse this attempt to distribute baby porn.

;)

Seriously, it wasn't until I read the second "excuse the nudity" post that it suddenly hit me that the PTB were taking down the pictures. The Victorians made a vain attempt to diaper animals so women and children would not see the naughty bits. This whole attitude is so utterly stupid it leaves me speechless. What's sick is that the people doing the censoring don't know the difference between naked and pornographic, so they take the "Let God sort them out" approach. This is not assuming responsibility, it's avoiding it. What a surprise.

The TOS is a crock. Mind you, "It's their site, and if they say all your pictures must include humping camels, that's their prerogative." Just as it's mine to do nothing to support them. Why I only stroll around here and never spend a dime.

I think the snuggie on Post 14 is very suggestive, by the way. Better take it down. Also, have you noticed how the Capital B looks like boobs? And what is that coming out of the top of a lowercase sans serif 'i'! Is there any chance that we can be restricted to a less depraved font? Please?

M