Not so - see TOS: >>>> # No images in which characters under the age of 18 >>>> give the APPEARANCE of having no clothes." >> not so again. this has been explained. do a search >> for when the rules were brought in. the kind of >> image I stated was allowed ;) This is beginning to sound like Alice trying to reason with Humpty Dumpty. If I were about to post a picture of bathing a baby and I read the TOS (not the learned explication of the TOS), I would not post. SO WTF difference does it make if the TOS doesn't mean babies in bathtubs? It says babies in bathtubs. I was planning to post a picture of a naked child foot passing a doorway with the caption, "I'm hiding because I'm naked." Wait for the TOS storm to fall on me.... Like I said, I love the TOS. It's like going to the zoo. M