"Giving the appearance of having no clothes" This clause was introduced in an effort to prevent people from posting pics of children that look naked, then saying "Ah ha, but REALLY she is wearing a flesh coloured bodysuit!" or posting an image of a naked child standing behind a gate which "just happens" to cross the child at groin and breast level and then saying "Ah ha, but REALLY she is wearing a very small bikini behind there!" Truthfully, babies in bathtubs is a tricky subject because it can be depending on the camera angle, etc. Images are judged on a case-by-case basis by the staff. For example, this photo was allowed to remain as it is a head-and-shoulders portrait shot. The staff could not see a reasonable grounds for removal. However, bathtub shots where the camera is above the child and the lower torso/legs etc can be seen (even if covered by bubbles) have been removed. Hope this helps. Karen

---

"you are terrifying
and strange and beautiful
something not everyone knows how to love." - Warsan Shire