No, mrsparky. A celebrity haven't should more rights and controls over their image than some "unknown" person. But a celebrity and the crew rolling him/her are accostumed to convert each movement out of their brides in money. Sorry if I have a poor general impression about celebrities Example: if I'm a normal guy, and I sent a photo to Casette and suddenly I discover Casette has designed a freebie with my face, I can be happy or angry but probably I have more important things in mind to worry about it But if I'm the lawyer of Antonio Banderas and suddenly I discover there's a freebie by Casette called "Antonio Banderas for Michael 5" and I see that with a big demand to Casette, Renderosity, e-frontier and DAZ3D I can get a bunch of bucks from Antonio (having success or not that demand), I'll call Antonio Banderas and I'll say: "boss, you must see this, these fellows are using your image out of our license" Capitalism, yeah. If I kill my wife, surely I'll be in jail the rest of my life. But if my name is O. J. Simpson and (perhaps) I kill my wife, I have an enormous amount of dollars to buy my freedom. Your rights are proportional to the money that you have This is the difference I see when I talk about celebrities and normal people. I'm sure no one of my forum ex-friends could demand me, they have no money or time for nonsenses. Lawyers of celebrities yes, they NEED to squeeze their client

CASETTE
=======
"Poser isn't a SOFTWARE... it's a RELIGION!"