Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: Good intentions versus copyright rights...?

Casette opened this issue on Dec 24, 2005 ยท 33 posts


momodot posted Mon, 26 December 2005 at 5:42 PM

Steal $50 and your are a rotten dirty thief. Steal $50,000,000 and you are a pillar of society.

IMHO people have no right to sue unless they can demonstrate actual damages... that is the standard to which us plebes are held why should it be any different for the people with the money? Oh yeah, because they got the money :)

Daumier said his drawing of a pear was just a drawing of a pear and if the prosecutor thought it looked like the Emperor it was certainly not the fault of the artist. He did however serve six months.

I say Cassette, do your worst!!! Strike your blow for artists, where would Picasso have gotten if he had been sued by the linoleum manufacter who produced the wicker cane he used in his collage? Anyway, aren't there not jurisdictional issues in your case anyway?