karen1573 - i do appreciate your clarification. that said, pm'ing every artist in the marketplace isn't my idea of an easy shopping time. if you can communicate to the Admin team the request that they actually announce major changes like this in this (Poser, in case this gets moved for some reason) forum, that would be appreciated. when you say the galleries are the same as they always were- how are we to understand that? you say it goes by judgment- the same judgment that put default miki and default aiko as underage. since most people don't see miki that way and tend to render her without any more than expression and posing morphs, i could see this having a substantial impact on the galleries. also, aiko (and anime doll and maya doll, or have the Admins forgotten them as well?) at default is standard anime and frequently used for characters from age 18 to 30 or so. simply put, this classification as underage is relevant to anyone who might render these characters nude and has never thought of them as underage and therefore needing adjustment or covering. i certainly think this decision relevant to understanding the parameters of the judgment of underage (unless the Admins don't have a say in the gallery content)and to knowing what is necessary to avoid T.O.S. violation. also, since you imply it's largely unnecessary, egregious and somehow uncommon (possibly lewd?) to want to see all of a texture when buying it, why not just eliminate the nude promos altogether? if they're that irrelevant, wouldn't that make everyone else more comfortable?