From reading the first post it doesn't sould like the alleged "harrasser" did anythign actionable. AFAIK there is no law agaisnt taking pictures of peoples houses (as long as you don't tresspass to do it) and the documents he obtained from the court were most likely public record or he woudln't have been able to get them. I don't knwo about Ohio but in Illinois there is no Cause of action for "harrassment". There is "sexual harrasssment" but no action for plain vanilla "harrassment." Cases like this are very very few and far between that is why it they get so much attention. The error occurs when peopel with interests in curtailing our rights, lie and say that our courts are full of cases like this. They are not. These interested companies then lobby for legistlation making it difficult to acces the courts when you need them.