"The default tree is worse than Bryce's" I officially don't believe that, lol... Yeah, I have always loved the look of Bryce's renderer, except for the speed of it. That's why we need to have Bryce capable of using 3rd party renderers, absolutely like Vray! Bryce's rendering engine, a raytracer, although very precise/true, is like all raytracers, slow. The precision is what you would want when rendering reflecions, refractions, glass transparencies or shadows. Yet, if it is just a landscape with trees or volumetric clouds that didn't call for precision, we need a fast scanline renderer option. (or something similar). AS

Contact Me | Gallery | Freestuff | IMDB Credits | Personal Site
"I want to be what I was when I wanted to be what I am now"