Well for one, in the thread you linked to it's pretty much a given it's been "proven" unless you want it proven in a court of law. Two sites have already pulled his stores. I'm not quite sure why you think it should be hidden though. All kinds of criminals have their names posted in the newspaper before they've even been to court. Police blotters are a matter of public record. I think if you polled people it would be fairly split about whether it should be allowed or not. Some people need to vent, some don't. Let people vent and if you don't like it, don't continue reading those threads. (Note, I'm only referring to the issue in the linked thread not the other ones you asked about. The ones before anything have been "proven" should be handled differently.)