Spoilsport... lol! Come on... the same questions come up every year... and the same excuses in response... Maybe if the process was a little more transparent, then the questions wouldn't be asked? So - there were approx 600 submissions for the call last year, and you and Linda culled those to 200 to send to the publisher to select 11 images from (you and Linda get at least one image included each for being facilitators) It would be really interesting for the rest of us to see the process in action - from all of the submissions made, down to the ones sent to the publisher, to the ones finally selected for inclusion in the actual calendar. The logistics of such an exercise are not really that great as you well know - not with the wealth of great gallery based software out there in the public domain, etc... it could be done fairly easily, and possibly stop the same questions happening every time you call for submissions for a new calendar... I'm not being totally unreasonable in asking these questions, am I? T.

Who? Me?