I really am trying to figure all this nervousness about sex is about in the US when I walk out my door here in Europe, past all these centuries of anatomical honesty. If God gave you a child without genitalia, I doubt that anyone reading this would be grateful. And yet there is surely at least one person out there who is grateful that the DAZ babies do not have genitalia. I am sure that people exist who believe that if poser children (and even animals!!) were biologically correct then there would be more paedophilc priests and so on. So they feel a special right to try to restrict other people's freedoms. Personally, I am throughly repulsed and sickened by the sexual and other ways in which children too often get mistreated in our society. But I don't believe that this can be corrected by keeping their genitalia (or the genitalia of animals!!)out of sight!! Assuming that it can just seems irrational and hysterical. Moreover it seems too lazy to study, and also suggests people whoare fearful of looking more deeply into our institutions and ways of life, and the nature of political movements. The naked Manneken Pis or "pissing little boy" has been a symbol of Brussels since 1619. I would be very surprised to learn that there is more paedophia in "Brussels than in Boston. This is by no means my own personal idea of cute, but Europeans seem to think it is cute rather than something that might trigger immorality. This sort of thing suggests to me that there is some deeper problem in our society and that being nervous about genitals on meshes and the imaginary immages of artists who are struggling to keep up with computers is not being willing to think about the deeper social issues.