Talos opened this issue on Mar 04, 2006 ยท 18 posts
MachineClaw posted Sun, 05 March 2006 at 1:39 PM
Gwendolyn is the only one that can say what the product really is supposed to be or not, ask her. As to celebrity likenesses and everything, recently the actors guild almost went on strike because of demands for more rights in computer games, voice overs etc. Recent cases where celebrity's faces have been plastered onto x rated or even nude shots the celebrity has won the case. up until recently the poser 3d celebrity looklikes have not been an issue. In poser 5 and poser 6 you can take a 2d photo and use the face room to have your favorite star nude and pose then how you want to. A court case my not have happened yet, but brokerages are very careful about what they sell, they also look at what is going on in the legal dept's. Renderosty has a no nudity on 1st promo shot of a product and that is from an outside influence. As far as I know there are only 2 poser products that have been okayed by the celebrity them selves. DinaV and the Anna-Marie Goddard Digital Clone. When Anna-Marie 1st came out there was a hellova backlash on the EULA until Daz and Anna-Marie changed it. There are a lot of stars and celebrities that do know about Poser and 3d, more than you would think. Last year at Siggraph there were a lot of star sightings, and Poser was in a booth as well as Daz. Anyway, way off topic. I agree that the Livia body shape doesn't look like Adrienne. to me it looks like a face morph and a default V3 body. The sign of a good product is it's flexibility. I think it looks like 1 thing, other think it's another. That's a good thing. Now where is the Elmo digital clone, I have some uses for that Muppet wahahahaa.