I used Rendos TOS to emphasize how harmless the pics that were deleted by Photobucket actually were. Come on, we all know that Rendo is a prime example of creeping censorship and unfortunately they successfully managed to get rid of everything but the mildest "artistic" nudity. (DAZ is of course even worse in that regard, no argue about that) So if a pic still is "good" for Rendo, it "should" be good anyplace else, shouldnt it ? I know the Photobucket TOS says "No Nudity", but were talking about RENDERS showing ARTISTIC NUDITY, not REAL pictures showing 100% hardcore porn. And if the "No nudity" actually means "NO NUDITY IN ANY SHAPE OR FORM WHATSOEVER BECAUSE EVEN A GLIMPSE OF V3s NEKKID BUTT WILL TURN OUR BEAUTIFULL INNOCENT CHILDREN INTO SADISTIC SOCIOPATHOIC PERVERTS IN THEIR LATER LIFE", umm, then why didnt Photobucket delete ALL my "dirty" pics ??? See, Im more genuine puzzled than angry. LOL. stahlratte