panko "Sorry to disappoint you linda 357, but I need to remind you that Botticelli's Venus is not making dinner or ironing, neither does Goya's Naked Maya, or Renoir's Suzanna, or further back Aphrodite of Melos... :)"

Yes, panko, they do not. But they do not sit there staring at you provocatively and promising all the joys in the world if you join their company either :))) It all about attitude that the artist puts into the model. There are TONS of nude photos in Photography gallery in here which are absolutely awesome and yet do not address the instincts.

It seems that most of the artists that use boobies for the boobies sake tend to forget that a female body is not a sexual object, not ALL the time at least. Sometimes it is a source of beauty. Sometimes it is just ... a body? a tool to live with in the world? and being naked doesn't mean ONLY offering sex. Sometimes, and most of the time being nude is just being nude :) Being a woman I somehow know what I am talking about. I suppose being a man is the same way ^_^

Second skin or tiny pieces of transparent clothes over the floating breasts are not better either :) Even worse, they do not get the nudity tag and you cannot filter them out for kids not to see. Putting it this way: would one of these nude or "clothed" Poser girls fit into a family oriented magazine? Botticelli's Venus will be there pretty comfortable. And Renderosity IS a family site.

Why not getting a special "Erotic" or even "Artistic Nude", if PTB want to keep things safe, gallery in here finally and let the things sort out all by themselves?

... is there any popcorn left? I see that we are out of m&mses already :/

Message edited on: 03/28/2006 02:15

www.Bucketload3d.com - where cool freebies are ~(==^..^)