That is such a bummer.

What could the copyright issue have been? if the  script contained no information from either figure when it was shipped then it would be no one but the user's business if they ran the script.

The script would analyze (I mean "render") the two figures .obj in the geometry folders and deform one of them to the other, the rigging information would be also be obtained on the client end from the character folder, the deformed figure and rigging might not even "exist" as a new entity if they are not saved as new figure :) I believe one is still permitted to use deformers on a figure during a poser session.

How a script with no propriatal data could be a violation is beyond me? Should I be denied access to scissors because I could take a render of V3 and cut out the face to paste on a render of Aiko? Maybe only the glue :)

There is that whole problem with Poser! I could use that application to spawn a prop of the V3 head and parent it or even even "substitute prop..." it to a Posette figure.  This Poser application is clearly intended solely for the purpose of pirating DAZ data... thank goodness there is D/S :) It must all be okay if I buy the scissors from DAZ. It is good to see the lessons of Apple are well understood. Cut off your nose to spite your face :)

Hmmm! Ouch! Ouch! Ouch! I set up a render of V3 and I wake up in the morning with a sore bum! Is that how the joke goes?