Quote - I've been wondering about that rule since it came into being, was it created as a response to complaints raised against the gallery? And if so, was 'virtual' child nudity an increasing problem before this rule was put into action?

I TOO second this question.  I TOO want to know.  This whole issue is very surrealistic.  I can buy David Hamilton's books, which involve REAL pubescent HUMAN females posed and photographed in the nude, at my local bookshop in Tel-Aviv; but 'I' or anybody else is forbidden to render similar images in Poser, which on comprises only the arrangement and rearrangement of digital values (As to whether I WANT to render any such image, that is STRICKLY my own affair, and not one I'm willing to give truck to anyone to tell me differently).  Frankly, this whole attitude as to what constitutes CP as regards to CG images is both overly officious, and insane. 
As things stand now, all I can say is: "Cupid, go get a G-String, you're in violation of TOS!"
David P. Hoadley

  STOP PALESTINIAN CHILD ABUSE!!!! ISLAMIC HATRED OF JEWS