jhustead opened this issue on Apr 25, 2006 · 31 posts
kuroyume0161 posted Wed, 26 April 2006 at 5:00 PM
Yep, it has all the earmarks of a two-part embossed sculpture being used in the fabrication. The body proportions are unrealistic (as is the face). The hair is oddly positioned for someone lying down as well as unmatted by the expected blood caused by the 'crown of thorns' and demonstrated on the shroud.
Not only did the carbon dating 'miraculously' (hehe) confirm the decree from a bishop that it was fraudulent back in the mid 14th century, but the world's foremost microanalyst, Walter McCrone, confirmed the dating and the lack of authenticity by showing that pigments were paint and not organic.
Skeptical Shroud of Turin
The Emergence of the Shroud
No use arguing, so that will be it from me on this topic.
Robert
C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the
foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg
off.
-- Bjarne
Stroustrup
Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone