drifterlee opened this issue on Apr 23, 2006 ยท 121 posts
mickmca posted Thu, 27 April 2006 at 6:34 AM
Quote - Incidentally, it is common on "adult" sites, that operate on a similar basis to Renderosity, to forbid ALL depiction of children, clothed or otherwise. I think this is perfectly right. The argument is, that on a site the very purpose of which is overtly erotic, any image appearing is eroticised by implication.
This makes perfect sense. The Coppertone girl (the toddler, not the newer parody) has a very different meaning displayed on a porn site. Let's stop calling them "adult" sites, shall we? Talk about Orwellian language!