Attached Link: An Example of a wildly different perception

> Quote - Pictures showing children in sexual acts is child porn.....and that is wrong no matter what.

I haven't heard of anyone trying to post those here, but they haven't stopped at banning those, they have gone even farther in banning everything that is even remotely childlike and even slightly nude. To borrow the expression "It's throwing out the baby with the bathwater." > Quote - Art showing children in their natural state, as long as artistic and not pornographic isn't wrong. . The problem is that one man's ART is another man's Porn, and visa-vesa

That's exactly why judgement on a case by case basis is not a fair and consistent standard. The mods have seen a lot of stuff and know by and large what fits in the guidelines or not but there are some discrepanies where even a group of them are making mistakes on the close ones and that kind of thing can throw off the standard so that the fear is to not put the effort into any since they might not be acceptable. For example, someone (that went by the name of a senate majority leader that was kicked out no less) commented on the image and called it bestiality when the figure was only standing next to a horse. These are the kind of people that are the most vocal complaint that busuness are so afraid of the lawsuits from. Is it fair to have to kowtow to such just because of their perceptions?

Click to get a printed and bound copy plus T-shirts, mugs and hats