drifterlee opened this issue on Apr 23, 2006 · 121 posts
dphoadley posted Thu, 27 April 2006 at 4:21 PM
"Pictures showing children in sexual acts is child porn.....and that is wrong no matter what."
"True!"
Alright, you two know-it-alls, put you money where your mouths are: Define for me the difference between child porn, as opposed to artistic license with nude pre-teen models.
Draw for me a description that includes both adolescent nudity and artistry, that someone prude wouldn't consider pornography.
I doubt you can. Which is why it is the ARTIST who must be the judge of these things, because censorship is simply intolerable in a FREE society.
David P. Hoadley