Okay.......so if a person owns 100000s of pictures of kids doing something sexual that is grossly inapporpiate it's ok as long as your an artist?

Child porn no matter whether done in art form or not is wrong. FULL STOP...an under 16 shown, in any kind of image,  doing any kind of sexual act is wrong. Anyone who says different in   MY OPINION..is wrong and needs their head testing.

99.9% of "people" found to have child pornography on their computer/in their homes are paedophiles and who rape and murder our children.  I am not saying pictures of nude children are wrong as long as they are in their own natural environment....but personally and I am sure there are 1000s of other people who say the same .....I do not want to see 2 ten year olds in a sexual provacative act. It's not natural and again in MY OPINION...is downright sick.

I can now see the paedophiles who may come on this site (I am not saying that they do by the way....I am speaking theorectically) will now stand up in court, when caught, and say....."but it's ok your honour...I am an artist"

"I didn't lose my mind, it was mine to give away"