drifterlee opened this issue on Apr 23, 2006 · 121 posts
dphoadley posted Thu, 27 April 2006 at 5:23 PM
"Okay.......so if a person owns 100000s of pictures of kids doing something sexual that is grossly inapporpiate it's ok as long as your an artist?"
Rhetoric! Nothing more and nothing less than silly rhetoric! It was just enough for me to read this tendencious one line to see little point in reading any further.
"If you are so clever why don't you tell us, the philistine prudes, what exactly defines child pornography in your eyes and art? I would love to see your answer."
I have no answer, but then I son't peresume to set myself up as a judge and jury over others. I think it is the provenence of each man to be the guardian of his own conscience.
David P. Hoadley
And by the way, I do have a name.