Argon, I think you might be missing the point I was trying to make.

There is NO WAY to put an age on something that is virtual. You HAVE to go by appearance. And for this reason anything that has the APPEARANCE of being under age is not allowed to be shown in the nude.

There are two issues here that seem to be melded into one. There IS a difference between child nudity and child porn. However, there are also some people that cannot separate the difference ... and some who are stimulated by ANY child nudity. I am not arguing that fact.

What I am arguing is that you can't take a figure and put a virtual driver's license on it claiming its age. The only way you can judge is on a case by case basis. And even then, opinions will vary.