Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: TOS - Is Vicky 3 over 18???

drifterlee opened this issue on Apr 23, 2006 · 121 posts


anxcon posted Fri, 28 April 2006 at 7:13 PM

xxxander, i had a girlfriend who was raped, and nearly died, was in the hospital for 4 months

her favorite thing after which (and during accually) were little cupid statues, and a few pics
she rendered of cupid, having just a lion cloth (or whatever is it) on. and sometimes faeries
then people label everything child porn, and they're deleted, when the pics were far from it
cupid holding a bow is on countless valentines day cards, so we're giving our kids baby porn?
should we take away every card like that simply because it has a baby's nipples showing?

the baby is not naked, but because it has a nipple showing, people like you who want it all
banned, label it child porn, and it gets taken down

and true while sick people go into these chat rooms, so do kids, you can go after the ones who
arents kids, while at the same time, ignoring the kids, and leaving them to join the rooms
its a 2 way street, sure some rooms are made for kids, kids belong there, but majority of
parents do nothing to see if its a "clean" room, do (usually) nothing to teach their kids not
to talk to those kids of people, and the rooms which were made for adults, have just as
many (and accually more) kids joining when they shouldnt, than adults joining kids rooms

NOT taking any blame away from the sick adults,  but when a parent does next to nothing
to stop their kids from joining in the first place, or in the case of kids rooms, teaching their
kids that bad people might be in them, then the parent is also at fault a bit

if a lion has cubs, but leaves them to wander in a meadow, and doesnt teach them to run
when there is danger, and they get eaten, who is at fault? obviously the one who ate them
as "they cant help themselves", but also the parents for not teaching

the danger will always exist, pics of nudity or lack thereof, will not change it, taking away
the freedoms of others who have nothing to do with it, will not change it, the danger remains
nudity isnt porn, hell theres probably porn with people fully clothed -_^
so to ban a pic that has no "naughty sexy touchy"stuff in it (vague limit to porn) is against art
and takes away freedom of expression