I suggest that Erotica has very personal definitions.  Your picture show a woman in a slightly erotic pose.  Your other picture show a woman in a very erotic pose.   No one said the pictures are pornographic or obscene; mearly erotic. 

When you look at the gallery page and choose the most viewed you get a collection of pictures (art) that are erotic and a large nuymber are nude. 

My original post talks about the use of Poser as a tool to express "erotic" fantasy.  You keep wanting to change my words to pornographic.  I am a member of Renderotica as well as Raunchyminds and I am very aware of what represents erotic and what is pornographic.

Sorry if it offends you but the two pictures in your gallery meet my definition of "erotic".  You could have chosen less provocative clothing and poses and yet you made a choice in each element of your artwork and most of those choices seemed focused on the erotic.

I have no intention of discussing pornography. I create it and I love it. It allows me to express in fantasy what can never be in reality.  While I do not care for some of the violent artwork I do accept that they have a place and are legitimate art.

Erotic; violent; pornographic are seperate catagories and should not be mixed.  I find your art to be erotic. I suggest you deal with it or stop creating your style of artwork.

 

 

Quote - > Quote - The second pic shows your female in a semi-see-thru dress in a very provocative pose.

The dress is the "Posh Dress" and is only shear from the knees down .... see the following link, 5th texture down:

http://www.morphography.uk.vu/dlposhv3.html

As for the pose?  If you consider a pose meant to depict someone stopping to check the heel on their shoe "very provocative", I strongly suggest that you stay away from places such as Renderotica et al.  By the sounds of it you meant something totally different in your initial post that what it came across like.  Do a google search for some of the terms you used.... you'll find out what  true "adult fantasy" is.