Quote - furthermore, let it go. acadia seems convinced that you want icky porn while her art is "soft and sensual". best to walk away from discussions with people who sling thinly veiled judgmentalism at you for pointing at the shady underside of the beast which they've dressed up all clean and wholesome with pastel colours and flowers, and just a wee bit of transparency below the knees of the burqa.

I totally agree with your post for the most part. 

However, I must correct you on the "thinly veiled" part. I don't make "veiled" judgements.  I put it right out there front and centre.  I stated several times that in my opinion that the way he phrased his post that it comes across as referring too porn. Nothing veiled about it. 

Did I make a judgement? Sure I did, but so did others.  Which is why people told him to go to Renderotica if he was looking for that "type" of "art".

No one is saying that what he thinks or does is a bad thing.  However I am saying that he isn't clear on the concept of terms, and as other pointed out, it's a purely subjective interpretation anyway.

As for the "burqa" statement?  I'm not even going to speak on it. I think it clearly states what your opinion is of women.

"It is good to see ourselves as others see us. Try as we may, we are never
able to know ourselves fully as we are, especially the evil side of us.
This we can do only if we are not angry with our critics but will take in good
heart whatever they might have to say." - Ghandi