How about I end this silly discussion.  It is obvious that you can't stand the idea that anyone might see any erotic qualities to  your artwork. The woman standing in the leather shorts is a sight that people see everyday so how could there possibly be anything erotic about it?   In fact there are several women around here dressed like that who hang around the corner most evenings.

 You are right.....  You are right...... You are right.   There that should finally make your feel vindicated in your need. 

I'll look forward to seeing what else you post to your gallery.

 

 

 

Quote - > Quote - furthermore, let it go. acadia seems convinced that you want icky porn while her art is "soft and sensual". best to walk away from discussions with people who sling thinly veiled judgmentalism at you for pointing at the shady underside of the beast which they've dressed up all clean and wholesome with pastel colours and flowers, and just a wee bit of transparency below the knees of the burqa.

I totally agree with your post for the most part. 

However, I must correct you on the "thinly veiled" part. I don't make "veiled" judgements.  I put it right out there front and centre.  I stated several times that in my opinion that the way he phrased his post that it comes across as referring too porn. Nothing veiled about it. 

Did I make a judgement? Sure I did, but so did others.  Which is why people told him to go to Renderotica if he was looking for that "type" of "art".

No one is saying that what he thinks or does is a bad thing.  However I am saying that he isn't clear on the concept of terms, and as other pointed out, it's a purely subjective interpretation anyway.

As for the "burqa" statement?  I'm not even going to speak on it. I think it clearly states what your opinion is of women.