Quote - > Quote - [...]. some pornography has quite a bit of artistic value (whereas most is just hastily thrown together crap) 

Excuse me, but it's pretty obvious here that you haven't actually looked at any of the pictures that can be produced here.

if its pornographic, its not here.
although ive seen several submissions in the rosity gallery which are blatant eroticism, theyre far from pornography.

artistic nudity = PG, erotic art = R, pornography = XXX

and i should clarify my earlier statement that 'there is no debate about what constitutes pornography':

you can debate whether something is erotic art, or artistic nude... fine art nude, eroticism, whatever the terms are. two people can look at a painting of a nude woman and one might see it as erotic, another might see it as a simple artistic nude.
but there is no real debate -- in renderosity gallery terms -- about what constitutes 'pornography'. by bringing in classic painters and how they were viewed you simple muddle things -- keep in mind that just a short while ago catching a glimpse of a woman's ankles was considered naughty. i am referring to current gallery submissions.

the rosity gallery has various forms of erotic art and artistic nudes created by people with varying tastes, skill levels and interests, but in the last 6 years i havent seen anything i would call outright 'pornography'.