Quote - What's not in the picture is only the imagination of the viewer, and is going to be different for each viewer.

people have been cleverly trying to manipulate the TOS ever since the rosity galleries first went up.

sure, some images have interpretations that will change with every viewer. they might be innocent artistic nudity to one person, and extremely erotic to another.

but if someone renders the immediate aftermath or prelude to a violent rape, for example, where the logical progression of events takes the average viewer in a direction that is clear violation of the TOS, then the image should be viewed as a TOS violation in itself.

same applies to someone who cleverly obscures TOS violations with objects in the foreground, hands, clever cropping, etc., for example. IMO a render of two people having sex, with the genitals obscured by a cup on a coffee table in the foreground is no less a TOS violation than if the genitals were in plain view.

again, this is my opinion. i consider this my place of business, so im not happy when images like the above two examples are submitted. my family, friends and  even business contacts sometimes come here, and to be honest i am glad that the administration is cleaning the place up a little. if anyone wants to view totally explicit and pornographic renders, renderotica is just down the hall. you sign no agreement when joining renderosity that this is the only gallery you can submit images to, or view.