drafter69 opened this issue on May 19, 2006 · 244 posts
pleonastic posted Fri, 02 June 2006 at 10:46 PM
Blackhearted, who gives a flying duck? the only one yabbering on about rosity's TOS here is you. the rest of us were having a perfectly civil discussion of perceptions -- about erotica, about porn, about art. until you came in with your arrogant eye-rolling and your know-it-all pronouncement of how obvious porn is, and how absurd discussing it all is (yeah, so absurd that it's been discussed by lots of smart people, including the supreme court of the US, with its well known penchant for absurdity).
now that you've managed to completely derail that oh-so-absurd discussion, would it be too much to suggest that you spare yourself, go away and roll your eyes at our absurdity in private? surely it's an enormous waste of your time to step down from your exalted level and mingle with us idiots. in private you can think some more about fine-tuning your assertions, such as that it becomes blindingly obvious why a mild fetish image is unacceptable to families with 10-year olds and your business contacts (who are all perfect clones of yourself?), but hundreds of scantily clad (if that), large-breasted women with come-hither poses are perfectly conducive to that wholesome family atmosphere. i must be completely unobservant of my neighbours, being as i think they'd consider those child-unsafe.
oops, did i just mock your superior knowledge? us uppity peons just don't know our place...