SeanE opened this issue on Jun 14, 2006 · 183 posts
Giolon posted Wed, 14 June 2006 at 1:21 PM
I was instructed to keep discussion to the same thread, so that nothing is missed. In that interest, bringing over from my other thread "RE: FAQ and info on the New Galleries":
Quote - StaceyG Q. Why are you resizing images?
A. There is no resizing algorithm in the gallery software. You are viewing the full-size image, we have instructed your browser to display it at a smaller width. If you are seeing jagged edges, you might investigate the resizing algorithm of your browser. Last night all the images we looked at in Safari, Firefox (Mac and WIndows), and Internet Explorer (Windows) looked absolutely fabulous.
It might also be a problem with your screen depth settings (16-bit, 32-bit, etc).
Just a suggestion. But we aren't resizing. Your browser is.
This is quite misguided. First of all, telling users to somehow "replace" the resizing algorithm used by their browsers is just downright comical. AFAIK, there isn't even a way to do this. If there is, I'd like to see the method of doing so provided. How many people would really go through that rigamarole and instead just remain unaware of it and look at the jaggy images thinking its the artist's fault?
Please take a look around thread. Some of us have posted screenshots of what we are seeing with the gallery's forced downsizing of images.
I am using WinXP SP2 using 32-bit color depth and a desktop resolution of 1280x1024, and I've checked in IE 6, 7, and Firefox on all with the browsers' "Automatic Image Resizing" turned OFF. Your galleries are adding "width=700" to the tags in the galleries and it is causing browsers to shrink the images with horrible distortion and compression causing artifacts such as jagginess. Telling people to switch browsers is not a solution (especially since I've tried several and all have the same issue).
Quoting from the general gallery feedback thread:
Quote - svdlI definitely DO NOT like the resizing of the images. Too much quality loss, and the fixed format does not take into account that higher resolution screens like 1280x1024, 1600x900 or even more are getting more common everyday. User options to select whether you want to see large images resized to a predefined screen size, or to view them as uploaded would be so much better. Take a look at how the Renderotica gallery software works if you want to know how it should be done.
That is an absolutely fantastic idea, svdl. The way that Renderotica does it is pretty much perfect, IMO. The option is in plain sight and visible so that people will see it, and it lets you know that the images you're looking at may have been shrunk (just as poorly over there as they are here I might add) to fit the screen. This makes the option to turn it on or off available and informative.
¤~ RadiantCG ~¤~ My Renderosity Gallery ~¤