Hi Geert, I think that there are a few different points you are touching on. The first one being, object that is BEING photographed, and secondly, the quality of the picture itself. I am not a professional photographer, so perhaps my viewpoint might be shallow...although I'd like to say that there is no such thing as a perfect object that one can photograph for the image. The criteria of a perfect photograph really depends on the viewer.... you know what they say, the typical cliche term of "beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder"... I beleive it works the same way when it comes to capturing an image, and what one makes out of it. Also, it relies on whether I am viewing the photograph from a scholarly point of view (professional) or from the eyes of the heart. It also depends what one is looking for. The criteria changes for every person over time, just the same as one's values and outlook. So, for example, Picasso never got recognition while he was alive....right? It was only after his death that he became so worldy renoun. Also, when one looks at a photo, he/she might be looking for something in particular, and this will all impact the impression the person receives. A lot of "ooh's" and "aahh's" might come from a lack of knowledge or language limitations. After all, a good photograph for me, is one that evokes in me some sort of personal and intimate connection with the photograph itself. Brightest Blessings to you my friend, Tofi PS: Kimmie: You are a darling sweetheart..... I love all the picturers in your gallery!!!! Ditto to all that Geert said about your little girl!

A smile is a curve that has set many things straight