Hey Everyone! I'd have to disagree with you Richard, on this particualr "cow" issue... :) I think that you're right in what your saying about there being a visually appealing component to what makes a photograph "successful"... in terms of contrast, texture, lighting, etc.... however, the other issue at stake which you have voiced your opinion about-- the intimate connection... remains ambiguous and variable. For me, for instance, the photograph of the four cows brings back pleasant memories of my childhood running to get a cup of still warm milk fresh and "straight up"... ;) At that time in my childhood years, there was no pasteurization as yet.... (geez, i'm old!!! ) and so looking at that pictures evokes a lot of emotions and feelings for me. So, all in all, the picture of an "ordinary" group of cows, is perhaps (and is) much more successful as a photograph than say, a photograph of lions from a local zoo. Am I making sense here? I think what I'm trying to say is that the term "successful photograph" or even "authenticity" is one of great ambiguity. One that considers such things, should have an operational definition to go with it, otherwise its as good as .... ??? well, who knows.... As you have probably gathered, a large factor is personal connection. If I can visually look at a photograph and be inspired, or be in awe BECAUSE of, and due to the fact that it evokes memories, or it evokes some kind of internal feeling within, then its automatically scored brownie points with me.... and simultaneously, I'll notice and comment on some of the strengths and weaknesses of the visual appeal, the more technical stuff. Since everyone likes to add their two cents, I guess I'll have to add a third cent, Hugs to all, Tofi

A smile is a curve that has set many things straight