Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: What criticisms of Poser are valid?

gagnonrich opened this issue on Jul 04, 2006 · 181 posts


samhal posted Fri, 07 July 2006 at 9:32 AM

Still more good comments! I personally think Poser all by itself (with a good user) is fully capable of absolutely stunning images. It's also capable of complete crap also.

I have some of the other bigboy graphic packages also but for some reason Poser won out overall. I will be the first to admit that my early attempts at anything artistic with ANY of them would be deserving of all the disdain anyone could throw.

I think any of these packages can produce images that rival the best that any of the others can produce. The trick is that the user has to use the application to the fullest. I can create a mountain in Bryce that looks like the Vickie everyone here is talking about. Or, I can make a mountain scene that rivals any postcard avaiable...with no other tool necessary. It's all there if it's capitalized on. Same with Poser.

Too many Poser users don't take their work (or know how to) to what Poser is really capable of. I myself am still learning and I've been at it for....quite awhile now. :-)

Cheers,
Samantha

i7 6800 (6 core/12 thread), 24 GB RAM, 1 gtx 1080 ti (8GB Vram) + 1 Titan X (12GB Vram), PP11, Octane/Poser plugin, and a partridge in a pear tree.

Oh, and a wiener dog!