TwoPynts opened this issue on Jul 14, 2006 · 74 posts
gradient posted Sat, 15 July 2006 at 4:06 PM
Yes, very interesting discussion indeed. Re: the Eiffel tower...I have seen a list of other buildings that have so-called architectural copyrights. I recall that the Sydney Opera house is one of them...I will search for that list and post when I find it.
I also read somewhere that corporate logos can be shown....as long as they are NOT the main subject of the image.
Going further on this discussion....If I take a picture of a "licensed" flower....let's say a rose or tulip....would that be infringement?
@TwoPynts...yes, I see the copyright clause is absent now....but there is a check on your upload that makes you state ownership.
In youth, we learn....with age, we understand.