LostinSpaceman opened this issue on Aug 01, 2006 · 129 posts
kuroyume0161 posted Wed, 02 August 2006 at 7:41 PM
While I agree with everything you said, destro75, I do have a correction to make. They work hard to add the features that they like - while ignoring the vast userbase when they request features and bugfixes. This has been endemic for a very long time. Great, there is now dynamic hair/cloth, shader nodes, IBL/AO, and so on. But there has been no change to undos or rigging or anything else in about a decade.
And the idea that a complete codebase rewrite requires them no longer to support the vast content already available is hogwash (!!). There is no law (legal or scientific) that prevents them from moving to a new paradigm while not continuing to support the current one. Call it 'figures v2' or something, but if they can hook in all of those third-party additions, then they can 'hook in' a new figure layout (say with NURBS/cage tech and a better rigging algorithm).
At least e-frontier seems to be more competent and have a sincere interest in moving Poser forward. :)
Robert
C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the
foot. C++ makes it harder, but when you do, you blow your whole leg
off.
-- Bjarne
Stroustrup
Contact Me | Kuroyume's DevelopmentZone