Yes,  David; i think i understand all what you wrote. You remind me Axeye, embarassed of being so considered. A loyal point for both. The people who made the rankings coudnt do it better for the marketing in digital art and for the Marketplace, so its clear is becoming all this for the 'production', like potatoes for the beach.

They can do whatever they want, but i see many sections that are getting in extintion. They are very worried with the childs and makings censors absurds, like with a friend in a replica of Raphael renacentist painter. An example of extintion: the abstract gallery. How many really abstract creators are here? And they have almost all their gallery invaded by the fractalers when they consider its 'fractal&abstract'. But is not a problem, they will not correct this 'little things'. I like to see abstracts, but to find one i have to see a lot of fractals.

With the minorities they never have considerations, as in all the places. I am in the minorities and i pay to post here 11$, moreless, per month. More than the double than in devianart. A lot of posers, scifis, fantasies, and nude photographers doenst pay nothing, and seems they have all the privilegies.

The general gallery is more than the 60% posers, practically all in the same style. Its 'funny-pathetic'. With this rankings, they are fomenting still more the posers, fantasy, scifis, nudephotowomans. Yes, they are exceptions in the personality of the creations, but they always comfirm the law.

Digital art for the masses, potatoes for the beach.

-------------

And i will go to the beach now