Yeah one of the things about things like that is that of course they will go where the money is. I don't see in the near future anyone giving Wings and Blender top marks. I think a good review should have the reviewer stating what kind of things they like to do with a program and what they like and dislike in an interface before they even do the review this will give the reader an idea of where the reviewer is coming from.
    
    The reason I say that I could see a reviewer reviewing a program like Silo. The review is really bad they don't like it. Well what you don't know is that the reviewer only makes airplane pictures and he foudn it was not that good for making airplanes. Most Silo users use if for character creation. You need to knwo the context of the reviewer before you even can read the review objectivly.

     If you read the same reviewer over and over you get a feel for that they like and dislike and you can be more objetcive.

The wit of a misplaced ex-patriot.
I cheated on my metaphysics exam by looking into the soul of the person next to me.