ashley9803 opened this issue on Sep 01, 2006 ยท 71 posts
mickmca posted Mon, 04 September 2006 at 7:38 PM
I have an amusing perspective on this whole discussion, because I just had a gallery item censored and my "record" tagged because there was a naked adolescent n the background. Never mind that there was nothing sexually exploitive about the picture, and never mind that when I posted the picture, it was not in violation of the TOS.
The justification for flagging me with a black mark is my violation of "U.S. Law." To which I could retort, if I thought retort was worth the trouble, that the original painting, which also has a naked adolescent in the background, must be subject to the same laws, laws which apparently Sun, the host, and Carol Gerten, a nice American housewife, choose to flaunt. This is hardly the place to be carrying on about censorship elsewhere.
And for the record, I have no objection to R'osity making rules for its own website. I simply find it nothing short of insane that I have been declared a criminal retroactively. So let's not pretend those rules are irrelevant to the discussion, neh?
M